> GUEST POST by ‘Ponderings’ re #McCann Case.
Kate and Gerry tell the world Madeleine is dead. Why isn’t the world listening?
The brain knows what it knows, it knows the truth after all it was there when the deed was done.
Lying is stressful, we all know this thus we try to avoid it either by omission or minimising or in rare cases creating a whole new reality.
When we speak, the words spoken or written down are though of a microsecond before they are spoken or written, from these words we can see what is at the forefront of the subject’s mind, what they are thinking about as they speak or write.
The brain wants to tell the truth, it wants to speak what it knows to relive the stress.
If we take the time to listen and look at the words from the subject we can see the truth be it a tiny marble or nugget or a full confession.
Kate and gerry have told us on multiple occasion that Madeleine is dead, that, despite their utterances to the contrary, they know she is dead, how and when she died, even why she died.
Despite their falling back on judicial secrecy to maintain the charade, the use of 3rd parties to leak information and divert attention, their desperate attempts to control the media and interviews, placing restrictions on questions that can be asked and ridiculous demands, even to hamstringing their pi’s with a limited remit on what they can look for and do and a nice gagging clause should they come up with anything that even vaguely points a finger at the mccanns, as we found out recently when it was revealed they had sat on e-fits for 5 yrs and their pi’s had noted inconsistencies etc.
Is this the behavior of innocent parents or more the behavior of parents with guilty knowledge and desperately trying to avoid prison?
Let’s look at what the mccanns have told us.
Kate said: “It really isn’t easy,” coping. “Some days are better than others. … There’s days when you think, ‘I can’t do this anymore,’ and you just want to press a button, and we’re all gone, and it’s all finished, and we’re all together and gone. Wherever. But you can’t, you know. Just occasionally you’ll have a — if you’re having a really bad day, which we do. And you can’t help but think that.
It is fascinating to listen to kate talk, she uses a lot of 2nd person pronoun, a lot of you rather than the expected I.
When she speaks there is a lot of distancing, this leads me to wonder if she is the submissive in the relationship.
What is clear there is a great reluctance to take ownership of what she says and does.
if she can’t take ownership, i can’t do it for her.
What caught my eye here though was not the pronouns rather one single word which told me she knew Maddie was dead.
What is the word?
The word is ALL
All means everything, all inclusive.
She uses it not once but twice making it sensitive.
She refers to wanting to press a button and they would ALL be together they would ALL be gone.
Think about it for a moment.
If Kate pressed a button and they would all be gone, they would all be together then she has just told us Maddie is dead. it is the only way they could all be together.
If Maddie was alive, kate has just killed her remaining two children , gerry and herself and made Maddie an orphan.
Is this the behavior of a rational mom?
Do you know of any mom who would kill her remaining children because she lost a child?
We hear of children being murdered by a parent either because of a custody battle ( if i can’t have them no one can) out of altruism (disabled child put out of it’s misery often with the parent) out of religious belief (they won’t go to heaven if they grow up so I’ll kill them now and they will) or a parental psychosis such as post natal depression or mental health issues.
We also hear of parents killing a child by accident, through abuse or even premeditated because they don’t want the child.
This is scary as it tells us if the net closes in kate will possible commit murder suicide.
She has nothing left to lose except her children and if she can’t have them no one can.
It is also interesting that kate distances herself from her comments in anything sensitive and relating to Maddie. Why doesn’t she take ownership of her daughter like any mom?
Given that we know she struggled with Maddie from the get go, is this emotional gulf a part of why she died?
There was never a maternal bond when she was alive and it manifests itself more blatantly now she is dead.
Another comment she made
They were doctors as were others, they could have done CPR till the ambulance arrived.
Oh dear gerry, this is a huge slip of the tongue.You have just told the world Maddie is dead and that you were both involved.
Innocent parents would have said no evidence to implicate us in her DISAPPEARANCE since she was allegedly abducted and could still possibly, though unlikely, be alive.
She is dead and you have told us there is no evidence to implicate you in her death.
Why then was there the rush to hide her body. set up a fake abduction, a fund and outright refusal to co-operate or have kate answer those 48 questions.
There is evidence Maddie died in the apartment though.
The cadaver and blood dogs reacting behind the sofa and in the wardrobe in your bedroom gerry, kate’s pants, a child’s red t shirt, cuddle cat, the key fob and the hire car, a car hired 25 days after Maddie went missing.
Evidence of a death in the apartment despite no record of anyone every dying there.
Evidence of a death and a missing 3 yr old toddler.
No evidence of anyone entering the apartment and abducting Maddie despite your claims.
The smashed open shutters and jemmied window and the door hanging open as your called your family that night and told them what had happened.
Sounds good, except it wasn’t like that, hell even the pink princess had to admit there was no evidence of an abduction.
You say no evidence to IMPLICATE us in her death.
Interesting use of the word implicate, why the need to tell us there is no evidence to implicate you in her death when you just told us there was no evidence she was dead?
This makes it sensitive.
We know you know there was evidence, the claims the blood and body fluids found in the hire care came from dirty diapers, rotting meat, sweaty sandals , oh and the Sea Bass Sean had taken a liking to.
I liked the fact you specifically stated Sea Bass as opposed to fish in general, Sea Bass can give off a tiny amount of cadaverine in the right circumstances.
If this was the case then surely your hands etc would also have cadaverine on since it doesn’t wash off easily.
You fail to explain why you had to leave the boot open every night as witnessed by neighbors (independent witnesses) and even your chum john admitted the car stank.
Remember the pink princess saying there was an innocent explanation for any evidence that may or may not be found?
Why would he need to tell us this?
If there was any evidence found, surely it would point to an abduction and the abductor, unless, there was no abduction or abductor, in which case there would need to be an innocent explanation.
“and from our perspective, the most important thing is that Madeleine probably still is alive.“
From your perspective she is probably still alive, let me rephrase that, from your perspective, she HAS to be alive otherwise apart from the fund being a fraud and the charges resulting from a fraud both here but also in America (they don’t take kindly to wire fraud) there would be a lot of awkward questions and charges.
From the perspective of others she is probably, or most definitely, dead.
Qualifiers weaken a statement, the more qualifiers the weaker.
Probably still are qualifiers, without the meaning of the statement stays the same.
When you read those last few words it sounds off, out of order.
What would flow more easily is “is probably still alive”
This is how we would say it.
Why is gerry so disjointed when he speaks, just like kate is?
Probably still is alive sounds strange, it sounds probably still alive as to what?
Probably still is dead?
A live Maddie means donations to the fund however small, it means the fund can be used to support the family, her family, in any way it chooses
A dead Maddie means the fund is donated to other charities as per your own rules.
I suspect though there will be some form of get out clause perhaps you starting your own charity and then taking a salary from it, rents and bills etc, all of which soon mount up.
That is, of course if there is any money left after you have paid your lawyers and legal bills as well as any compensation to Dr. Amaral.
BTW just how do you propose to pay all your legal fees etc?
Carter-ruck aren’t cheap and despite you saying they do a lot of work for free i bet there are some hefty bills.
Does Richard Branson still support you, what about brian kennedy?
Did you use their donations to your legal fees fighting fund?
Is there any money left to pay your fees?
What happens when the truth comes out, and it will.
Will all those who donated thinking your were innocent, want their money back?
Obtaining money by deception is a criminal offence, all those millions needing to be repaid.
I wonder if anything your bought with fund money will result in a proceeds of crime penalty?
Pay it all back or face extra jail time.
It started out as a faked abduction, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report.
Now it also involves obtaining money and services by deception, wire fraud, perhaps even embezzlement if it turns out you used the fund for stuff it wasn’t intended to be used for.
BTW what happened to a fully transparent fund as you claimed, following good practise and all that?
After the first year, and it’s revealing account of where the money went, mortgage payments and £37,000 on a basic website, the fund suddenly became as transparent as a barn door.
Why was that kate and gerry?
What were you hiding?
You see the brain wants to tell what it knows, a crime once done cannot be undone, it becomes not a case of if, rather, when, you will be caught.
Right now you are surrounded on all sides, the legal trial, the PJ investigation, the SY investigation and who knows what else and where else.
Trusted friends 6 years ago are no longer as trusted, or even friends, relationships change, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse.
Right now the only thing linking you all is a sordid dirty little secret about the death of a little girl and the subsequent cover up.
What went on before Maddie died?
Who was involved?
Can you trust them to stay on side? to stay quiet?
Will the do a plea deal when they see which way the wind is blowing?
Can you trust kate gerry, and can you kate, trust gerry?
What if the twins remembered things that could incriminate you?
You can stop them growing up unless you do a Maddie on them, you can’t stop them reading the papers, accessing the net or listening to the news, family and friends.
Once they reach 18 they are their own person, how will you answer their questions, explain your lies and non co-operation?
How will you explain away making Maddie a ward of court?
Keep talking McCanns and chums, the more you speak the more we know the truth.
To view the original article CLICK HERE
By publishing a Guest Post or article written by a third party does not mean this blog or I agree with its content unreservedly!
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.
Details & Links:
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS:
Views I respect & almost Totally Share:
General ‘Stuff’ archive:
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: